FED. JUDGE OK'D GAY-BASHING IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS

Though George Herbert Walker Bush's Republican party was already fiercely and maliciously anti-gay when Bush was elected U.S. President in 1988, the Republican party was not satisfied with the first President Bush's level of maintaining sexual orientation apartheid -- and thus at the 1992 Republican convention, where Bush was the nominee, Pat Robertson -- declaring open war on LGBT Americans -- criticized Democratic candidate William Jefferson Clinton by saying that Clinton wanted 1) to end the ban on gays in the military and 2) to appoint out gay people to his administration.

Pause for a moment to consider what it meant that a sitting U.S. President did not denounce and disown Robertson and his anti-gay hate speech. (Robertson today continues as one of the most malicious of all public gay bashers). Those unfamiliar with state-sanctioned persecution of gays in America should learn about Executive Order 10450, signed by President Eisenhower, which effectively banned "known homosexuals" from serving in government posts. The book and film The Lavender Scare provide historical background to the state-sanctioned persecution of gay human beings.

George H.W. Bush appointed Gerald E. Rosen (gerald_rosen@mied.uscourts.gov) to be a federal judge for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. Readers should note that Rosen has been involved in some controversial cases involving Michigan Attorney General Mike Cox, who notoriously permitted Assistant Attorney General Andrew Shirvell to carry out a stalking and harassment campaign against gay student Chris Armstrong. The reasons that Cox did not more swiftly act to protect Armstrong against the gay bashing Shirvell -- at the time an Assistant Attorney General -- remain unsatisfactory and unacceptable. Had Shirvell been stalking and harassing a student as part of an anti-Semitic campaign rather than as part of an anti-gay one, he most certainly would have been stopped sooner.

In 2003, Judge Rosen issued an Opinion and Order in the case Hansen v. Ann Arbor Public Schools. The Ann Arbor Public Schools in 2002 held a diversity week. Where LGBTers were a topic of that diversity week, the Ann Arbor Public Schools intended to educate the school community about the harms of ignorance-fueled anti-gay bigotry. One of the diversity week panels was to treat of "Homosexuality and Religion" with invited speakers explaining how strong acceptance values are compatible with religious belief.  A gay bashing Catholic student, Betsy Hansen, and her gay bashing Catholic mother wanted for Betsy to be included on the panel to allege that their religion authorized them to gay bash in public schools.

Ann Arbor Public Schools did not allow Hansen to change the topic of the panel presentation from acceptance to non-acceptance of gay human beings.  With Thomas More Law Center attorneys, Hansen sued on free speech and other grounds.  Judge Rosen dismissed part of the charges but found in the gay-basher's favor on certain free speech grounds. Where Rosen interpreted precedent law in favor of the gay bashers, he did so determining that Hansen's anti-gay hate speech presented no danger to LGBT students in the school environment. To illustrate why I disagree with Rosen's decision, I am paraphrasing written evidence in the case submitted by the gay-bashing Betsy Hansen, and recasting it to be against Jews instead of against gay people:
_____________________________________

"One thing I don’t like about Diversity Week is the way that Jews are being portrayed as having rights in public schools equal to those of Christian students.  Religion is a choice, Jews can choose to be Christians, and as everybody knows, Jews that don't accept Jesus are going to hell.  Anybody that chooses to be Jewish has made the wrong choice, and one that is very harmful to society. I completely and whole-heartedly support diversity, so long as it doesn't include teaching acceptance of Jewish people and ideas, which by definition are always wrong and disgusting."

______________________________________

My guess is that had Hansen been dealing with an anti-Semite instead of a gay basher, he would have understood why students of the Jewish minority needed protection against such hate speech in a public school setting. Judge Rosen certainly ignored the extent and insane ferocity of ignorance fueled anti-gay hatreds in U.S. public schools and how those anti-gay prejudices had since the inception of the Republic negatively impacted sexual minority students. Rosen is now Chief Judge in the U.S. Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, where the Thomas More Law Center has filed a pleading against the Howell, Michigan Public School District on behalf of the gay bashing Catholic Sandra Glowacki and two of her gay-bashing offspring. The Glowacki pleading is stuffed full of language defamatory of all gay human beings. Do not hold your breath expecting Judge Rosen  to agree that LGBT public school students merit protection from these monsters. The Glowacki case is assigned to Judge Patrick J. Duggan, who was educated at the Jesuit Xavier University in 1955, during the time that gay human beings were effectively banned from the U.S. government. 

MONEY, AND THE GAY-BASHING GLOWACKIS

by Scott Rose

On Spirit Day, 2010, in his Howell, Michigan public high school classroom, student Daniel Glowacki said "I don't accept gays."

Teacher Jay McDowell eventually told him he had to leave the room.

The question of whether McDowell violated Glowacki's free speech rights is presently the subject of a federal lawsuit being brought by Daniel's mother Sandra Glowacki in his name, and in the name of another of her offspring. The pleading is full of language defamatory of gays as a class of people and thus now is the subject of my request for the Attorney Grievance Commission of the State of Michigan to investigate Glowacki's attorneys.

It appears that should this lawsuit go ahead, the determinative facts might have to be ascertained from many student witnesses deposed and/or put on the witness stand under oath.

However all of that may be, Glowacki at all moments admits that in class that day, he said "I do not accept gays." The incident generated controversy in the Howell community. A few days later, Glowacki's mother told a local newspaper "The things people have been saying online about my son have been terrible." Remember; this woman's son said "I don't accept gays" on SPIRIT DAY. Remember too that the LGBT community has had to suffer actual school board members, such as Clint McCance saying that they want all "fags" to commit suicide.

Now here's where this gets REALLY interesting. Sandra Glowacki told her local paper "My son is not a bigot. He has a very diverse group of friends that includes some gays. If a gay student was being picked on in class, he’d stick up for them." Daniel Glowacki . . in this period when he was taking heat for having said "I don't accept gays" told the reporter: "I never said I was against gays."

The Spanish expression is A otro perro con ese hueso . . take that bone to a different dog.

One could speculate that Sandra Glowacki and her son Daniel alleged that Daniel accepts gays after all, perhaps in order to get the criticism then being made of him to die down.

And now, Sandra Glowacki is demanding in a federal court that McDowell and the Howell Public Schools give them MONEY  . . . and I'm repeating the word so it's clear what is involved . . . . . $$$$$MONEY$$$$$  . . . for not having allowed Daniel to continue to create a classroom environment hostile against LGBTers after he said . . . (we're not yet sure how many times) . . . . but possibly more than once . . . and on Spirit Day . .  "I don't accept gays."

It's enough to make somebody ask themselves "Why would people who said 'My son has gay friends' and 'I never said I was against gays' now file a lawsuit asking for $$$MONEY$$$, $$$MONEY$$$, $$$MONEY$$$ because they don't think Daniel Glowacki got a chance to say "I don't accept gays" enough times in a public high school on Spirit Day?"

Different school districts have different policies but it's hard to imagine many American schools today that would allow students to say and repeat "I don't accept Christians" or even "I don't accept African-Americans." (Note that Daniel's same high school had a notorious anti-African American incident involving  students and the Confederate flag, and that the violators were disciplined). It hardly even seems likely, for example, that in an American public school, a student could say, and repeat and then repeat again, over and over and as many times as she pleased during the year "I don't accept Jesus." That statement would too likely provoke a disruption to the learning environment.

The system already "gets" why it can't have public school students saying "I don't accept Jews" and "I don't accept Mormons." But the reason controversy arises around the phrase "I don't accept gays" is that anti-gay bigots like Beverly Lahaye say hateful things such as "They are not a legitimate minority group." Look in the comments under the many right-wing Christian blogs now going into spasms over a Catholic gay basher's alleged right to gay bash, and it won't be long before you hit on anti-gay comments such as "They aren't human." And that is the tip of the ice-berg of the anti-gay vitriol. Under the Thomas More Law Center's Facebook post about the lawsuit, Glowacki supporter Rhein Krigner said "Teach that crap to my kids and I will kick your ass and stick you back in the closet." TMLC's FB page administrators left that comment up for several days while interacting with others on that same comments thread. The gay-bashing comment only disappeared from the thread after my Complaint to the Attorney Grievance Commission . . with that comment mentioned inside . . got published online.

The Glowackis' lawsuit asks for the Court to declare the Howell Public Schools' anti-bullying policy unconstitutional. That is not likely to happen, as precedent law shows that students' free speech rights in public schools are not identical to first amendment rights. One is perhaps not incorrect to opine that what's at stake in this lawsuit . . . besides $$$MONEY$$$ . .. $$$MONEY$$$ . . .$$$MONEY$$$ for the Glowackis (and their Thomas More Law Center attorneys, who are busy waving the Complaint document under anti-gay bigots' noses to attract donations, even though papers have not yet been served on the Defendants) . .  is whether American society is ready to think that LGBTers are really human and a legitimate minority.

OPEN LETTER TO GAY-BASHER DANIEL GLOWACKI

From: Scott Rose

To: Daniel Glowacki

Listen, Glowacki you gay-basher. I am calling bullshit on you and your gay-bashing lawsuit that asks a US Federal Court to have a school's sexual-orientation-specific anti-bullying policy declared unconstitutional.

Firstly, let's review the events of Spirit Day, 2010, on which your lawsuit is based.

Apparently, teacher Jay McDowell was wearing a purple Spirit Day shirt in honor of Tyler Clementi while teaching an anti-bullying lesson that was NOT limited to anti-gay bullying. You began your challenge against your fine teacher when he asked another student to remove their Confederate flag belt buckle. It defies credulity to suppose that you had no idea about the Howell School District community's recent history with malicious anti-African American bigotry connected to the image of the Confederate flag. I call bullshit on you in a first instance for your having challenged teacher McDowell over the matter of the Confederate flag. In case you need a reminder of what happened in your community with the Confederate flag, go here. Be sure to read the hateful anti-black comments under that post.

The Howell Schools' anti-bullying policy gets published in your local newspaper. It says that no verbal harassment may be directed against a group.  That's what you did, when in class you created a learning environment hostile to LGBT students by saying "I don't accept gays."  Nobody in that classroom said "I don't accept Catholics."  No victim need come forward with a complaint about your bigoted remarks, for your behavior to constitute a violation of the school's anti-bullying policy. Because your community, and you, in many ways create a hostile environment for gay human beings, it must be allowed that a student in that classroom that day could be actually gay but fearful of coming out because of the toxic environment that you have some responsibility for having created. I repeat that nobody in that classroom said "I don't accept Catholics."  You are not a victim of anything; you are a violator of the school's anti-bullying policy, which absolutely would protect you against having to put up with somebody saying "I don't accept Catholics" in a classroom.

One of the main reasons that I'm calling bullshit on you, and on your mother, is that you are talking out of both sides of your mouths. You told a local newspaper "I don't want people to think I'm against gays. That's just not true." And your bullshitting mother told that same paper "My son is not a bigot. He has a very diverse group of friends that includes some gays. If a gay student was being picked on in class, he’d stick up for them."

The lawsuit being brought by your mother in your name contains shocking language defamatory of gay human beings as a group; that language subverts the dignity of the Court. It is as hateful an attack against all gay people as the nasty anti-black comments written under the article about Howell Schools and the Confederate flag.

Your statement that you are not against gays, and your mother's statement that you have some gay friends, are completely contradicted by the hateful anti-gay lawsuit being brought in your name. Your attorneys are running around wagging the Complaint document under anti-gay bigots' noses and encouraging them to gay bash in your community and all over the internet.  

Your lawsuit is seeking to have declared unconstitutional an anti-bullying policy that protects you every bit as much as it protects LGBT students. If you want to be in a school environment consistently hostile against LGBTers, and where you may with impunity declare "I don't accept gays," then you should seek out a Catholic school that agrees to provide you with such an environment. 

You are a bullshitter, Daniel Glowacki and so is your mother Sandra. Nobody who really was not against gay human beings and who had gay friends would bring the lawsuit you are bringing against the Howell Public School District. 

Gay-Basher Sandy Glowacki's Dirty Laundry by Scott Rose

Sandy Glowacki appears to be a maliciously anti-gay Catholic bigot raising her children to believe nasty, ignorance-fueled, bullying non-acceptance of gay human beings. If she had been in Spain at the time of the Inquisition, she most likely would have believed that terrible things should happen to Jews if they refused to convert to Catholicism.

She apparently wants her sons to be able to gay bash in public schools and so in their name is bringing this lawsuit against the Howell Public School District in Michigan and against teacher Jay McDowell . McDowell does not believe in allowing students to display in non-scholarly contexts obvious symbols of hate such as Nazi flags and the Confederate flag (the symbol of an enemy of the United States) in public schools. He also supports sexual-orientation specific anti-bullying policies, as does the Michigan Education Association. 

Glowacki's suit is being brought through attorneys of the Thomas More Law Center, which describes itself as "The Sword and Shield for People of Faith" but which others often describe as a cesspool of fundamentalist dumbfuckery. The relentless gay-bashing language in the Complaint document reminds one that 1) the Wehrmacht uniform belt buckle read "Gott mit uns," (God is with us), and 2) that at the time the Vatican signed its political unity treaty with the Nazis, Jews had already been barred from the professions in Germany, and 3) that today in the United States, many vicious gay bashers attempt to hide their militant anti-gay malice behind a veil of religious justifications.

The Complaint document includes the hearsay, fraudulent claim that all gay persons are living a "destructive" lifestyle.  Sandy Glowacki's MySpace profile, meanwhile, states that Ms. Glowacki is a smoker. In other words, Glowacki is concerned about her offsprings' ability to gay bash in public schools because, allegedly, all gays live a "destructive" lifestyle, but meanwhile she exposes her children at least on some occasions to the destructive impact of second hand smoke.

Considering that Glowacki is bringing a lawsuit through a Complaint document that states all sorts of negative things about gay human beings and their intimate relations, it is very interesting to note that on MySpace, Glowacki participated in a survey game called "My Bar Tab."  Participants were given a list of questions, such as "Have you ever vandalized something?" Each activity was assigned a dollar value, vandalization for instance was given a $20 value, and then at the end of the survey the participant was supposed to publish on MySpace their total "Bar Tab," without revealing which of the expenses had contributed to their total.

Glowacki published in a non-confidential forum on MySpace that her "Bar Tab" total was ($)340.  So there's no way for us to know which of the listed "offenses" Glowacki admits to having committed, but we can nonetheless speculate on the percent of them she claims she has committed, given her "Bar Tab" total.  Most of the activities are assigned low dollar amounts . .  $5, $10, $25 . . . just a very few stick out for their higher assigned dollar values; Had anal sex is $80 and Had sex for money is $100.

From the public information on Glowacki's MySpace profile we see that she appears to be "Friends" with the teenager "B.Ware" whose profile photo as of this writing shows his muscular torso bare, with him standing in a sexually suggestive pose.  Glowacki's profile also appears to show that she has received multiple messages from "B. Ware"  How curious, then, that the "Bar Tab" list includes the question - Have you ever "Had sex with someone under 21 and you are over 27," -- assigned a $25 value.  Glowacki's profile says she is 49-years-old.

Even though social science and even empirical daily observation shows that *not* all homosexuals live a "destructive" lifestyle, many of the "Bar Tab" survey "offenses" (many of them actual crimes) that Glowacki perhaps admitted to having committted tend towards destructiveness, for example, driving drunk, "getting drunk, passing out and not remembering the night before," stolen something worth more than one hundred dollars, and beating somebody up.  The complete list of "offenses" in the "Bar Tab" survey and their assigned dollar values is below. There are only so many items on that list, most are assigned a relatively low dollar value, and Glowacki's non-confidential MySpace page has her published statement that her total "Bar Tab" was $340. Remember that Glowacki authorized a court document that defames LGBTers by stating that every last one of them is living a "destructive" lifestyle.  We have saved screenshots of all relevant pages of Glowacki's MySpace profile. It is just absolutely shameful for this woman to defame -- in an official court document -- an entire minority among her fellow citizens.

Bar Tab Survey

This is fun to do. Just read the "offense" and if you've done it, you owe that fine. Keep going until you've read each "offense" and added up your total fine. Title your bulletin "My Bar Tab is $........"

You don't have to confess your answers, just the amount of your fine.

Smoked pot -- $10

Did acid -- $5

Ever had sex at church -- $25

Woke up in the morning and did not know the person who was next to you-- $40

Had sex with someone on MySpace -- $25

Had sex for money -- $100

Ever had sex with the a Puerto Rican -- $20

Vandalized something -- $20

Had sex on your parents' bed -- $10

Beat up someone -- $20

Been jumped -- $10

Crossed dressed -- $10

Given money to stripper -- $25

Been in love with a stripper -- $20

Kissed some one who's name you didn't know --$10

Hit on some one of the same sex while at work-- $15

Ever drive drunk -- $20

Ever got drunk at work, or went to work while still drunk -- $50

Used toys while having sex -- $30

Got drunk, passed out and don't remember the night before -- $20

Went skinny dipping -- $5

Had sex in a pool -- $20

Kissed someone of the same sex -- $10

Had sex with someone of the same sex -- $20

Cheated on your significant other -- $10

Masturbated -- $10

Cheated on your significant other with their relative or close friend --$20

Done oral -- $5

Got oral -- $5

Done / got oral in a car while it was moving-- $25

Stole something -- $10

Had sex with someone in jail -- $25

Made a nasty home video -- $15

Had a threesome -- $50

Had sex in the wild -- $20

Been in the same room while someone was having sex -- $25

Stole something worth over more than a hundred dollars -- $20

Had sex with someone 10 years older -- $20

Had sex with someone under 21 and you are over 27 -- $25

Been in love with two people or more at the same time -- $50

Said you love someone but didn't mean it -- $25

Went streaking -- $5

Went streaking in broad daylight -- $15

Been arrested -- $5

Spent time in jail -- $15

Peed in the pool -- $0.50

Played spin the bottle -- $5

Done something you regret -- $20

Had sex with your best friend -- $20

Had sex with someone you work with at work --$25

Had anal sex -- $80

Lied to your mate -- $5

Lied to your mate about the sex being good --$25

Tally it up and Title it..."My Bar Tab Is ___"

HOW TO FIGHT BACK AGAINST THE GAY-BASHING HATE GROUP "CONCERNED WOMEN FOR AMERICA"

by Scott Rose

The so-called Concerned Women for America is a very powerful, politically-connected, viciously anti-gay lobbying group. The Southern Poverty Law Center's description of CWFA as an anti-gay group can be read here. Every time any matter of gay rights is before a legislative body anywhere in the United States, the sadistic, bullying haters of CWFA are there, urging elected officials to perpetuate sexual orientation apartheid.

This hate group opposes legal recognition of LGBT rights as civil rights. CWFA is even against gay human beings' right to consensual love-making in their own homes. To clarify that point; if CWFA had its druthers, gay people would be jailed for making love with each other. As a lobbying group, CWFA is very actively opposed to the proposed Employment Non-Discrimination Act. This hate group does incalculable harm by incessantly and intentionally telling demented lies against gay human beings. CWFA does not hesitate to tell their demented lies against gay human beings to U.S. government officials including Representatives and Senators.

These nasty gay-bashing bigots justify all of their political gay-bashing on a single, untestable, hearsay allegation; that homosexuality is "against God."  Below is a sample letter that you can send to your Congressperson, Senator and other elected officials, telling them that you will not stand for malicious, militant theocrats keeping you oppressed as a second-class citizen. To find contact information for your U.S. Representative, go here. Contact info for your state's two U.S. Senators is here.  Don't forget that the malicious gay-bashing bigots of CWFA also lobby your state representatives and senators; those elected officials, too, should know what you think of this hate group lobbying against gay Americans' equality.

__________________________________________________
Dear (fill in elected official's name)

This is to express utmost concern about illicit influence being exercised on the US Government by the anti-gay hate group Concerned Women for America.

CWFA's overriding justification for attempting to perpetuate sexual orientation apartheid is their untestable hearsay allegation that God hates homosexuality. Not only is the United States not a theocracy; whole churches ordain out married gay and/or lesbian ministers. The CWFA has no privileged relationship with God, and no sustainable claim to know, better than Christians fully accepting of gay people and supportive of their legal equality, what God wants American legislators to do with respect to gay rights.When anti-gay hate groups duplicitously claim that gay rights ipso facto curtail religious liberties, you can be sure that they are not talking about the religious liberties of churches, synagogues and other religious organizations that favor full equality for LGBT Americans.

CWFA's chief officers give themselves out to be "experts" where they are not at all qualified to speak on the given topic. Janice Crouse, for instance, recently released a gay-bashing video in which she falsified health statistics with a conspicuous intent to demonize all gay human beings. Crouse said, for example, that anal cancer is "very prevalent" among homosexuals. In truth, anal cancer in all populations is too rare a disease accurately to be described as "prevalent." Crouse has no qualifications or authority to speak about public health matters. Her Master's thesis was on Camp Meeting Preaching.

CWFA habitually demonizes sexual minorities with fraudulent statistics and lies. For such a hate group to influence any American legislative body potentially is unconstitutional and certainly debases the legislative body influenced.  I respectfully ask that whenever LGBT Americans' rights are involved in a proposed piece of legislation, you reject lobbying and lies from malicious anti-gay hate groups, and weigh your considerations of the proposed legislation in light of what scientific sources such as the American Medical Association have to say about sexual orientation.

Sincerely,

JANICE CROUSE'S LONG, SHAMEFUL HISTORY OF LYING ABOUT GAY HUMAN BEINGS

Janice Crouse's recently-released gay-bashing video is just the latest vile bit of anti-gay hate speech from this craptastic, pathological liar that heads the so-called Concerned Women for America's Beverly LaHaye Institute, named for the prominent Christofascist Beverly LaHaye, who is on record as saying that homosexuals are "looking for recruits" among "Christian" children. The philosophy . . if such we should call it . . . posits Evangelical gay-bashing Christianity as the only imaginable good, says that Evangelical gay-bashing Christianity must predominate in governments, and that all social ills can be squarely blamed on homosexuals.

In her latest anti-gay hate video, Crouse repeats the tired old canard that lesbians and gays have shorter life-spans. Crouse's co-conspirator in maliciously lying about gay people, Mary Frances Forrester, was married to North Carolina State Senator James Forrester, who lied about his professional medical credentials, and also frequently said that gay people have shorter life spans. Senator Forrester recently died, thank goodness, before reaching the average male American lifespan.

Many of the dubious statistics that Crouse uses as her weapons against innocent gay human beings seem to have been pulled directly out of her anus. Why, she even talks about anal cancer being "very" prevalent among gay men. Another statistic that Crouse apparently pulled out of her nasty butt says that lesbians are 4.5 times more likely than heterosexual women to have had more than 50 sex partners in their lifetimes. To the extent that anal cancer can be caused by HPV, using condoms helps to curb the spread of HPV, but guess what?  Crouse with her Goebbels-style anti-gay lies is against the use of condoms. In this broadcast transcript, Crouse says "I'm against condoms as a solution to the AIDS epidemic." Where it is pointed out to her that Brazilian officials wanted to insist on condom education, though a Bush "abstinence only" program was threatening to cut off US assistance to Brazil over the condoms issue, Crouse says "they've taken that stance, and they've said, you know, "We're not going to accept money." And, I say, "Tough. You know, it'll go to somebody else."

Crouse's vicious anti-gay lies barely merit being repeated in order to rebut them, except that the gay-bashing Nazi bitch's bio says that she GIVES CONGRESSIONAL TESTIMONY.

Now, what qualifications does Crouse have to evaluate human sexuality scientifically, or to formulate scientifically-informed (i.e., non-theocratic) notions about public health matters? 

Crouse allegedly earned a Bachelor's from Asbury University in Kentucky. According to that school's website, it's mission is to "advance the cause of Christ around the world."  Don't ask what habitual pathological lying about gay human beings has to do with advancing the cause of Christ. Also don't ask how Crouse was advancing the cause of Christ around the world when her anti-gay hate speech contributed to the murders of gay rights advocates in Uganda. At Purdue University, allegedly, Crouse earned a Master's in the history of camp meeting preaching in the U.S. And she says she earned a Ph.D. from SUNY, Buffalo in Communications Theory, writing on the topic of the debates between President Ford and Jimmy Carter.

The bottom line is that Janice Crouse has NO PROFESSIONAL TRAINING OR OTHER QUALIFICATIONS for evaluating gay people for any reason whatsoever. A person does not become qualified to talk about human sexuality and/or public health by studying Camp Meeting Preaching or the Ford/Carter debates. Yet this malicious anti-gay bigot has given CONGRESSIONAL TESTIMONY. See here for Crouse's article explaining to the public that gay rights advocates that talk about the elevated rate of gay youth suicide are the cause of heterosexual youth killing themselves. I kid you not, that this scumbag bigot stoops that low.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Call and/or write your U.S. Representative and your U.S. Senators. Tell them that you are sick and tired of vicious anti-gay bigots being called as "expert" witnesses for hearings. Tell them that you expect Senate hearings to adhere to scholarly standards for getting at the truth of a matter, and that bigots and bigotry have nothing to do with scholarly standards. Tell them that you are aware that the lying anti-gay bigot Janice Crouse previously has been involved in giving Congressional Testimony, and that you want a commitment from them that they will uphold the integrity of the Congress by never again inviting this malicious political gay basher to bear false witness against those of her fellow citizens that happen to be gay.

NAZI BITCH JANICE CROUSE BEHIND "KILL-THE-GAYS" LAW IN UGANDA

Janice Crouse (Nazi bitch) of the so-called Concerned Women for America's Beverly LaHaye Institute believes that "God hates" what homosexuals do and that if they do it, they should be killed.

Because she can't at present get that plan to murder all gays put into effect in the United States, she became part of the propagandizing towards the infamous, U.S. Evangelist-facilitated "Kill-the-Gays" legislation in Uganda.

Here, you can listen to the Nazi bitch Janice Crouse in a radio interview titled "Uganda Holding Firm to Biblical Values." At the time of that broadcast, in Uganda, Christian religious leaders and government figures were conspiring to do away with gay human beings by publishing their addresses in newspapers and ordering henchmen to persecute them, with the persecution not stopping short of killing them.

Though HIV/AIDs in Uganda -- as throughout Africa -- mainly is transmitted among heterosexuals, and from mothers to their fetuses, the Nazi bitch Janice Crouse in her broadcast claims that because an abstinence education program had been thought to lead to a reduction in HIV infection rates in Uganda, "homosexual activists" were targeting Uganda to move into it. Do you get what vicious propaganda Crouse was engaging in?  She was saying that because a country had experienced some success in containing AIDs, gay people were motivated to undo that success. The Nazi bitch in her broadcast carries on at length about how Ugandan Christians don't want Western gays imposing an outside culture in their country, with no apparent awareness of how ridiculous she sounds, in view of the fact that Christian missionaries did not impose their gay-bashing faiths in this region of Africa until late in the 19th century -- and at that -- as a part of power grabs by competing colonializing powers. To show you what a wonderful thing the Christian missionaries did by imposing themselves on the Africans, a civil war broke out in the territory now Uganda between British Protestant missionaries and French Catholic missionaries.

The gay-bashing Nazi bitch Janice Crouse even attacked President Obama for naming Ellen . . that Ellen . . Ellen DeGeneres as a "Global AIDS Special Envoy."  The Nazi bitch Crouse objects to Ellen in that role because she is "openly lesbian" and "an activist on the issue of homosexual rights." 

Have you got that?  The gay-bashing Nazi bitch Janice Crouse is against *all* rights for homosexuals. That is why she propagandizes in favor of getting gay human beings killed, for all that she attempts to hide her genocidal wet dream behind blah-blah-blah involving God and Jesus.

Recently in the United States, the Nazi bitch Janice Crouse has been perpetrating a smear campaign against gay human beings, in support of fascist anti-gay politicians such as Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich. Never forget . .. and we really do mean . . . NEVER FORGET! . ..  that the female leaders of the women's branches of the Nazi Party exhorted German women to keep "good Christian homes" for the Vaterland.  To tell the Nazi bitch Janice Crouse directly what you think of her political gay bashing, go here.

MAGGIE GALLAGHER'S SLEAZEBAG SLAP AT ZACH WAHLS

Recently, the video of Zach Wahls testifying in Iowa about his two loving, lesbian mothers was widely re-circulated around the internet.

Zach gives the lie to the so-called National Organization for Marriage's endless demonization of gay human beings generally and gay parents in particular, so it was no surprise that this week, the NOM blog featured a post by a vicious anti-gay bigot who used discredited statistics to say, in effect, that all gay parents are bad parents. The vicious anti-gay bigot's main message was, Zach Wahls is the exception that proves the rule - so you can safely go back to demonizing all gay people and gay parents, despite him.  Be sure to read all the malicious, gay-bashing comments that the lying, gay-bashing monsters at NOM are leaving up under that blog post.

NOM's vicious propagandizing attracted attention, whereupon Maggot Gagginwhore duplicitously posted that "A Link is Not an Endorsement." Gagginwhore's galling hypocrisy in saying that "A Link is Not an Endorsement" is well-analyzed by Jeremy Hooper here. And, as long as Maggot wants to make her current claim that "A Link is Not an Endorsement," she'll understand why we're now linking to this video of a River Hippopotamus in an article about Maggot Gagginwhore.

In her post, Gagginwhore said "I would like to say personally that nothing in any argument I've ever made on gay marriage, rests on the idea that same-sex couples harm their own children at any higher rates than any other family form. (If there is data that shows this, I've never seen it.)"

Yet, right on Maggot Gagginwhore's NOM site, people are told that gay parents ipso facto are doing any children they might be raising an injury: "A loving and compassionate society comes to the aid of motherless and fatherless children, but no compassionate society intentionally deprives children of their own mom or dad.  But this is what every same-sex home does — and for no other reason but to satisfy adult desire."

If Maggot Gagginwhore expects us to believe that she doesn't engage in demonizing gay parents, then she'll order all of NOM's sites scrubbed clean of material that demonizes gay parents.  Don't hold your breath.