LAME SPLC HITS NOM WITH NOODLE

NOM hate group leader Robert George,

who believes, and aggressively promotes the idea

 that sexual minorities are sub-humans undeserving of rights

by Scott Rose

In its summer, 2012 so-called "Intelligence Report" on the National Organization for Marriage, the Southern Poverty Law Center once again -- for whatever reasons -- has not had the cojones to classify NOM as an anti-gay hate group, though any objective evaluator examining the evidence would be able to conclude that NOM fits the SPLC's hate-group criteria.

Here is the SPLC's own succinct expression of what qualifies an organizaton for anti-gay hate group status: “[T]heir propagation of known falsehoods – claims about LGBT people that have been thoroughly discredited by scientific authorities – and repeated, groundless name-calling.”

It therefore is curious and disturbing that the SPLC ends its so-called "Intelligence Report" on NOM by alleging that "it remains to be seen whether NOM can avoid following other religious-right groups into a world of untrammeled hate."

This reminds us of when Indira Gandhi was facing a popular uprising against her rule in India. Saturday Night Live broadcast a skit, of Indira in her office, with the people outside boisterously clamoring for justice while Indira clasped her hands together, looked upwards and pleaded with God to give her a true sign that the people no longer wanted her as their leader.

A cow then crash-landed through the roof on top of Indira Gandhi.

The Southern Poverty Law Center appears to be waiting for a cow to crash through its roof, before it will certify NOM as an anti-gay hate group.

Here is an example of how the SPLC's summer 2012 "Intelligence Report" failed to consider the proper incriminating evidence against NOM;

The SPLC report largely is taken up with the matter of NOM promulgating the known falsehood that homosexuality equates to pedophilia. The report discusses NOM Blog links to Michael Brown's gay-bashing wherein Brown equates homosexuals to pedophiles. The SPLC lets NOM off the hook there, though, apparently on grounds that Michael Brown is not himself part of NOM.

SPLC then cites Maggie Gallagher's NOM Blog post "A Link is Not an Endorsement" and alleges that in it, she made a "noteworthy comment," which would be this: "I would like to say personally that nothing in any argument I’ve ever made on gay marriage rests on the idea that same-sex couples harm their children at any higher rates than any other family form. (If there is data that shows this, I’ve never seen it.)”

Flabbergastingly, the SPLC did not then go on to point out -- in its so-called "Intelligence Report" -- that Gallagher's claim in her "noteworthy comment" is a lie, as has been very well documented by researchers and reporters more willing than the SPLC to expose NOM. Gallagher in truth had, in the past, repeatedly demonized gay parents. The SPLC actually wrote -- about Gallagher's claim that she had never defamed gay parents -- "Gallagher may be entirely sincere, but sometimes it's hard to tell."

Hard to tell?

NOM's malicious bigot Maggie Gallagher,

who says she is "unwilling" to live in a country

with anti-discrimination protections for LGBTers

Firstly, the SPLC missed the fact that Gallagher's "A Link is not an Endorsement" post was non-specific -- Gallagher did not state that she was referring to NOM's defamatory anti-gay pedophilia allegation links  -- and, the SPLC seems not to have realized that at the time Gallagher made the post, NOM was engaged in a hateful, lies-filled propaganda blitz against gay adults having any interaction with children, period, but especially, that of parenting them. Gallagher at the time was also being criticized for linking repeatedly to many different sorts of anti-gay hate speech posts, not only for links to posts saying that gay equates to pedophile. In other words, the SPLC missed the gay-bashing NOM forest for a few gay-bashing NOM trees. If now, however, the SPLC requires further resources to verify that Gallagher "personally" often has insinuated that gay equates to pedophile, they could look here. It just boggles the mind that the SPLC actually wrote into its so-called "intelligence report" the phrase "Gallagher may be entirely sincere, but sometimes it's hard to tell."  That is not the work of determined, competent investigators. 

Gallagher cultivates strategies for suckering people with her duplicitous lies about her own record of anti-gay hate, and she succeeded in suckering the SPLC. The SPLC purports to be evaluating NOM, but evidently has not yet even realized that NOM's Maggie Gallagher is characterized by her shamelessness about lying through her teeth while talking out both sides of her mouth. They are giving Gallagher the benefit of the doubt, despite all the heaping evidence that Gallagher deserves no such benefit.

Even if the SPLC could not be bothered to research the mendacity of Gallagher's claim regarding her past statements on gay parents, the SPLC might at least have exposed Gallagher's post title as a lie. That title, again, was "A Link is not an Endorsement."  On November 16, 2011, for one among any number of available examples, NOM linked to a gay-bashing post by Elizabeth Marquardt on the Huffington Post; the NOM Blog post text began by saying that Marquardt makes a good point. How much more blatantly could a link be an endorsement than that? Furthermore, looking through a quantity of NOM Blog posts makes evident, from NOM's chosen headlines for the posts alone, when it is endorsing or opposing the main idea presented in the post. Why is Gallagher so easily able to pull the wool over the SPLC's eyes?

A NOM supporter brought this anti-LGBT genocidal sign

to a NOM hate rally

Moving on now, SPLC did not report that NOM itself was busy smearing gay parents raising children, in the same period as it was linking to Michael Brown's propaganda equating gays to pedophiles. The SPLC failed to realize that NOM was on a sustained and vicious, lies-filled anti-gay parenting propaganda blitz, not just saying here and there that gay equates to pedophile. On the NOM/Ruth Institute blog on November 14, 2011 Jennifer Roback Morse attacked gay parents and at the same time, exhibited the NOM strategy of seeking to drive a wedge between African-Americans and gays. The post was made before the NOM documents detailing the gay-bashing-bigot group's infamous race wedge strategy became public. Yet, the SPLC summer 2012 "Intelligence Report" came out well after a judge ordered the NOM strategy documents released. The "Intelligence Report" does not even mention NOM's racial wedge strategy, still less the fact that Morse's NOM/Ruth Institute blog post evidences that hateful strategy, with fireworks going off around it. As part of her gay-parent bashing, race-baiting attack, Morse asked this, apropos of mainly white gay parents adopting African-American children: "look at the children in these posters.  I wonder what the African-American community thinks about recruiting gay men to become foster parents for the children of their community who have been taken from their parents.  Do the African-American pastors have any thoughts and opinions about this? I imagine they do. But I will let them speak for themselves."

So it does not go unremarked, I am emphasizing that the racially-charged lie that NOM's Morse was telling there, was that white gay adults were stealing African-American babies. The malicious NOM bigot was just cunning enough to make her wording of that lie a tad vague, but the meaning she intended her gay-bashing readership to come away with was, beyond a reasonable doubt, undeniable. Morse intended to convey the idea that white gay adults were stealing African-American babies, and that she would leave it up to African-American pastors to denounce the white gay adults for that.

Don't forget that Morse's attack post was published in the same period that NOM was, very obviously, on a propaganda blitz linking homosexuals with pedophilia, and identifying gay parents as dangers to the children they are raising. The SPLC did not connect the gay-bashing hate dots, there. The SPLC reported on the NOM blog's link to Michael Brown's gay bashing, and then to Gallagher's duplicitous "A Link is not an Endorsement," post, but it did not report that the NOM link to Michael Brown was only one small element of an enormous anti-gay propaganda blitz that included anti-gay hate expressed directly by NOM, or that Gallagher lied in her "A Link is not an Endorsement" post. There is a certain impression that the SPLC is afraid of fully exposing NOM.

Because NOM's Morse said that she would let African-American pastors speak for themselves, I subsequently interviewed Pastor Michael Bledsoe for my report "African-American Pastor Rebukes NOM's Anti-Gay Bigotry." Meanwhile on the NOM Blog on November 16, 2011, NOM explicitly endorsed more gay parent gay-bashing when it titled a post "Holly Carmichael on the Tragedy of Depriving Kids of Their Dads." With that title, NOM endorsed the idea that all instances of gay adults raising children are "tragedies." SPLC, moreover, completely ignored that on December 8, 2011, NOM Blog took a sleazebag slap at Zach Wahls, and then left a quantity of anti-gay hate speech online in the comments under that sleazebag slap. NOM has its blog administrators curate the comments, meaning, anti-gay hate speech in those comments is part of the NOM brand.

Speaking of which, as a regular contributor to The National Review, NOM's Maggie Gallagher has more than once advertised that the SPLC has not classified NOM as a hate group. Such advertisements from Gallagher inevitably attract fierce gay-bashing comments from NOM supporters, which Gallagher and her TNR editors -- who curate comments -- then evidently do not mind leaving posted to the internet as part of their brand. Under this particular Gallagher advertisement that NOM is not an SPLC hate group, commenter "motherofthetroops1955" said that "Being termed a "hate group" by the Southern Poverty Law Center is a badge of honor," and went on to call equality advocates "people who not only stand for evil, but are evil, and who must be defeated by any means necessary." The central problem here, of course, is that Gallagher and NOM assume and exploit a certain level of public legitimacy from the fact of SPLC not having classified them as an anti-gay hate group, yet Gallagher very actively seeks to de-legitimize everything the SPLC does. She lies about the SPLC just as she lies endlessly about gay people, but in the face of it, the SPLC ignores the mountainous evidence of her lies and gives her an unwarranted benefit of doubt. Gallagher condemns LGBTers and the SPLC, both, very deceitfully, and far more thoroughly than the SPLC ever criticizes her for her attacks against it and against LGBTers. 

In this CNS News post, Gallagher called the SPLC a "homosexual activist group" and said that such groups want "to do more than redefine marriage, they want to redefine civilized discourse in America."

What about that quote from Gallagher does the SPLC not understand? Gallagher has said that the SPLC not only wants to redefine marriage; it wants also to move society away from verbal gay-bashing. In other words, Gallagher actively wants for verbal gay bashing to remain acceptable. It is no secret that Gallagher has written "I oppose extending anti-discrimination laws to gays for many reasons." And as we know, but as the SPLC  ignores, the endless verbal gay bashing from NOM officials and NOM-approved speakers includes saying that homosexuals are "worthy to death." Be sure to note that Gallagher accusatorily says that the SPLC wants to "redefine civilized discourse" -- as though anything in all of her gay-bashing were "civilized" and as though it were "civilized" for she and NOM to have sponsored a hate rally where a NOM-approved speaker told the mob that homosexuals are "worthy to death."

Gallagher in that same article alleges that her fellow anti-gay group the KKK uses language to incite to anti-minority violence which, so she claims, she and other anti-gay groups do not use. She says that the SPLC should not be going after non-KKK anti-gay groups, because -- so Gallagher is alleging -- non-KKK anti-gay groups do not incite to violence. But there she is, sponsoring a public speaker to say that homosexuals are "worthy to death," and never even thinking to denounce him, or to apologize for that having happened at a NOM rally. If one needs additional evidence that NOM bolsters incitements to anti-gay violence, one could look at the fact that NOM made a fund-raising video with Jerry Buell, a Florida public school teacher who told his class that gays should be allowed to serve in the military, at the front lines with hetero troops deserting them from behind. After same-sex marriage was legalized in New York, Gallagher as a guest on David Barton's Wallbuilders radio program got Barton so riled up against Republican State Senators who had voted for equality that he said "No disrespect to our Native American friends, but this is where you hang a bloody scalp over the gallery rail. You hang these four Republican scalps over the Senate rail and every other Republican senator looks up and sees those scalps and says, ‘my gosh, I’ll be hanging up there beside them if I don’t stay with this pro-family stuff.’ And that’s exactly what has to happen.” Gallagher inspired that hateful outburst, but never distanced herself from it. And as a matter of fact, in describing how NOM would work towards its goal of eliminating marriage equality in the Empire State, Gallagher said "It's gonna be a bloody mess in New York." 

Barie Shortell was attacked for being gay,

in a city where a NOM speaker told a mob

of gay-bashers that homosexuals are "worthy to death"

If NOM and other anti-gay hate groups are not associated with violent incitement -- as Gallagher lyingly tells the world -- then why is she threatening a "bloody mess" to stop gay and lesbian couples from marrying in New York State? Gays and lesbians maybe would threaten a "bloody mess" against her -- in any circumstance -- but especially were she to stop attempting to get their marriages annulled against their wills? What bad thing, exactly, are gay New Yorkers doing to Gallagher, that she is threatening them with a "bloody mess" to take away their rights? And remember; Gallagher accuses the SPLC of wanting to "redefine civilized discourse" by having society get past the unmitigated ugliness of verbal gay-bashing -- but then -- Ta dah! -- there she is, the pig, threatening a "bloody mess" to take away gay people's rights. How terribly, terribly civilized of this hideous, lying, professional gay-bashing bigot! Why did the SPLC leave NOM's pattern of violent incitements out of account? A more detailed, later feature article could be devoted to NOM's sometimes successful plotting to scare and intimidate people out of supporting equality, and its strategies for keeping LGBT Americans living in fear.

A further quote from Gallagher in that same article exemplifies why the SPLC should have NOM and Gallagher tops on their lists of anti-gay hate groups and figures. Look at the following Maggie Gallagher quote from that article:

The SPLC says "that if you say that gay men have a lower life expectancy, that that’s hate, even though it might be true," Maggie Gallagher told CNSNews.com. “There’s actually a pretty good study from 2001 that suggests that gay men live 8 to 21 years less. I don’t know for sure that it’s true, but it’s striking. And it is certainly true that gay people have higher rates of depression and anxiety and substance abuse. But apparently, if you say that, you’re a hate group now.”

Let us now examine, for SPLC officials' edification, what Gallagher just did there.

1) In the context of denying that any of SPLC's listed anti-gay hate groups are hate groups, Gallagher cited a falsehood about gay men's life expectancy, and then said that the falsehood "might be true."

2) Gallagher goes on to say -- in 2010 -- that a 2001 study "suggests" that gay men live 8 to 21 years less, but does not name the study, still less talk about what might have changed since 2001, and still less why such a study would justify denying gay men rights;

3) Gallagher -- the constantly lying anti-gay bigot -- then says that she doesn't know "for sure," whether the alleged study results are true, "but it's striking."  Gallagher very obviously, in a practiced, malevolent way, is laboring to get her gay-bashing audience to believe as true the very things that the SPLC has already identified and documented as anti-gay falsehoods. In attacking the SPLC while communicating anti-gay lies to her anti-gay followers, Gallagher is thumbing her nose and blowing a gleefully malicious Bronx cheer at the SPLC, who appear not even to comprehend the gay-bashing involved in Gallagher's manner of going after them.

4) Gallagher then rubs salt in the wound, by saying "And it is certainly true that gay people have higher rates of depression and anxiety and substance abuse. But apparently, if you say that, you're a hate group now." There, she gives the lie to her claim that repeating those defamatory allegations leads to one's organization being classified as an anti-gay hate group, because there she is repeating them as "certainly true," yet she and her group NOM have not been classified as an SPLC hate group, despite her having done this exact kind of anti-gay hate-mongering and disinformation campaigning over and over and over again, with no attempt to hide any of the evidence of it from the SPLC. Moreover, Gallagher intentionally, and clearly, is leaving her gay-bashing audience to believe that where gay people have higher rates of depression, anxiety and substance abuse, they have those higher rates because they are gay, not because they face stigma and discrimination from people like her. Remember: Gallagher has written “I oppose extending anti-discrimination laws to gays for many reasons.” The unmistakable appearance is that whereas Gallagher is fearless and utterly shameless about lying her head off in order to lead the charge against the SPLC, the SPLC is fearful of marshaling together and then publishing all of the evidence of her untrammeled hate.

The SPLC's greater sin of evidence omission, as regards NOM, though, is the dismaying fact that their so-called "Intelligence Report" nowhere mentions that NOM's current mastermind is its founder and chairman emeritus Robert George, shown with his picture on the NOM site as a current member of NOM's personnel. (Could one reason that the SPLC would be afraid of NOM, perhaps be that NOM's Robert George has so much power?)  The record appears to show that the SPLC has been looking at NOM, without apparently ever looking at Robert George, which means that the SPLC has not really been looking at NOM at all.

One could write reams and reams about the SPLC's utter lameness in ignoring that Robert George still is NOM's mastermind, but no matter how thorough and eloquent one were to be on the topic, one would never be able to say anything as apposite as the thought expressed in the single word "DUH!"

Back in December of 2010, the SPLC reacted -- with a post on its website -- to criticism of the SPLC carried out on NPR by a certain Matthew Franck.  Franck claimed that opposition to same-sex marriage alone was earning various groups a place on SPLC's anti-gay hate group list. So the SPLC clarified that the following criteria land groups on the list: “[T]heir propagation of known falsehoods – claims about LGBT people that have been thoroughly discredited by scientific authorities – and repeated, groundless name-calling.”

The SPLC apparently has yet to put 2 and 2 together as far as Matthew Franck goes. Their post correcting his propaganda against them does mention that he is affiliated with The Witherspoon Institute, but not that NOM's Robert George is a prime driver of The Witherspoon Institute.

"Duh!"

There is much direct evidence that NOM engages in "repeated, groundless name-calling" against LGBTers, yet the SPLC is ignoring that direct evidence. In its so-called "Intelligence Report," the SPLC even ignored the evidence of groundless name-calling in the narrow topic it pursued.  Yes, SPLC; when NOM rolls out an extended anti-gay propaganda bombardment alternating allegations that all gay people ipso facto are unfit to parent, with allegations that gay equates to pedophile, NOM is engaging in "repeated, groundless name-calling."

What would NOM have to do, for the SPLC finally to acknowledge that the gay-bashing hate group is a hate group?  Robert George has said that homosexuality is "beneath the dignity of human beings as free and rational creatures." And at an all-day anti-gay symposium at Liberty University, George's NOM/Ruth Institute colleague William Duncan gave a session on this topic: "Homosexuals or Homo Sapiens: Who Deserves Protected Class Status?"

So NOM's leadership is routinely referring to LGBTers as sub-humans unworthy of rights, and routinely also saying that gay equates to pedophile, and that gay parents equate to dangerously bad parents, and that gay adults are stealing African-American children, and on and on and on with the repeated, groundless name-calling, but for its so-called "Intelligence Report," the lame SPLC can't bring itself to determine that NOM is engaging in "repeated, groundless name-calling" against us. Think hard about what it means that at Liberty University, a NOM official held a symposium session titled "Homosexuals or Homo Sapiens; Who Deserves Protected Class Status?"  Think hard about that, while remembering that NOM's Maggie Gallagher attempts to smear the SPLC for wanting to "redefine civilized discourse in America." Heaven forbid that Gallagher and her fellow merchants of hate should no longer be able to sell their "civilized" idea that gays are sub-humans unworthy of rights.

It isn't as though nobody had ever furnished the SPLC with useful NOM-related research leads. I, for example, published "How to Report the National Organization for Marriage as a Hate Group" (to the SPLC) on September 29, 2011, and followed up by directly reporting to them through their website contact forms all of the information I have included above in this post, and then some.

N.C.'S GAY-BASHING ASSHOLE BIGOT QUEEN

(The Wehrmacht uniform belt buckle read "Gott mit uns," God is with us).

by Scott Rose

The sickening spectacle of Spammy Fitzbigot and Mary Frances Forrester exultant in their North Carolinian bigot victory is appearing in publications all over the internet today.

That these nasty lying bigots appear in the photo together with the image of the gay-bashing, Jew hating Billy Graham looming over them emphasizes that they worship according to the perverted hate script of the Christofascist branch of Christianity.  A church in Devon Park that was used as a polling place had a huge gay-bashing sign out front. (The Bigot Ballot nonetheless reportedly lost at that polling place). Billy Graham's bigot spawn Franklin Graham recently blew a racist dog whistle when he spoke of "the seed of Islam" being passed to President Obama by Obama's father, who was atheist. Look out, when you get vicious bigots smearing minoritiesby claiming that something evil about the minority generally is transmitted to all of the minority members' children through their "seed."

Mary Frances is the widow of the late N.C. State Senator James Forrester, who sponsored the Bigot Ballot and was another lying sack of gay-bashing bigotry.

Mary Frances Forrester notoriously wrote an anti-gay hate speech document in which she alleged that acceptance of LGBT human beings would cause the downfall of American civilization and that the average life span of gay males is 39. In telling those bald-faced, gay-bashing lies, bigot Mary Frances alleged that the Ten Commandments are the reason gay human beings must be shunned and oppressed, though the Ten Commandments say nothing about gay human beings, and include the injunction "Thou Shalt Not Bear False Witness Against thy Neighbor."

Mary Frances Forrester the lying, gay-bashing bigot was in league with the lying, gay-bashing bigots of the so-called National Organization for Marriage.  If you can stomach it, you can watch a video of both Forresters spewing their bile at an anti-gay hate rally.

What is it, exactly, about "Thou Shalt Not Bear False Witness Against thy Neighbor" that Mary Frances Forrester does not understand?

During her campaigning for the Bigot Ballot, Mary Frances Forrester seems never to have met with any real-live gay human beings, and never to have met -- with an open mind and heart  -- with, for example, heterosexual parents fully accepting of their LGBT children.  She had taken her lying, gay-bashing stand, and could not be bothered with any such silliness as "Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself."

When Michelangelo Signorile interviewed James Forrester, Forrester made a fool of himself. He lied about health statistics from the Centers for Disease Control, and cited the professional lying anti-gay and anti-Muslim bigot Frank Turek as a source for his misinformation.

The Bigot Ballot campaign brought out the worst in the bigots. Pastor Sean Harris's "special dispensation" for anti-gay parents to break the bones of their own children -- if the children are not strictly conforming to some vague gender norm -- caused decent human beings everywhere remember that the 3-year-old Ronnie Paris, Jr. got beaten to death by his own father, who thought he seemed gay. Not only do these gay-bashing Christofascists not love their neighbors as themselves; they don't even love their own children if the children seem gay.

James Forrester is already in the dust bin of history; Mary Frances certainly is in it in spirit. As we look forward to holding our society accountable for its promise of "liberty and justice for all," we must never forget these words of Coretta Scott King:  "For many years now, I have been an outspoken supporter of civil and human rights for gay and lesbian people. Gays and lesbians stood up for civil rights in Montgomery, Selma, in Albany, Ga. and St. Augustine, Fla., and many other campaigns of the Civil Rights Movement. Many of these courageous men and women were fighting for my freedom at a time when they could find few voices for their own, and I salute their contributions. We have a lot more work to do in our common struggle against bigotry and discrimination. I say 'common struggle' because I believe very strongly that all forms of bigotry and discrimination are equally wrong and should be opposed by right-thinking Americans everywhere. Freedom from discrimination based on sexual orientation is surely a fundamental human right in any great democracy, as much as freedom from racial, religious, gender, or ethnic discrimination."

MAGGIE GALLAGHER IS A CRAPPY MOTHER

by Scott Rose

Maggot Gagginwhore, the professional, lying-assed gay-basher is so full of irrational, ignorance-fueled hatred against LGBT human beings that it is causing her to be the ultimate crappy mother.

Heterosupremacists don't come any more arrogant that Maggot; she once wrote that she was not willing to live in a society that does not treat homosexuals as dirty inferiors unworthy of rights.

Having gotten knocked up in college without being married, Gagginwhore just can't get enough of promoting abstinence-only sex education -- you know, the kind that left Bristle-Hole Palin in a life circumstance similar to Gagginwhore's. 

Maggot more or less admitted to an interviewer that she loved her baby daddy.  But her baby daddy told that same interviewer that he can't stand Maggot.  He said of Maggot Gagginwhore's gay-bashing hate speech: “I don’t read them extensively, because I don’t agree with them, and I find it personally painful to do so, as you might imagine.”

Maggot Gagginwhore presently is -- notoriously -- married to the cipher Raman Svrivastav.  According to this profile of Gagginwhore, there was a period when even the cipher couldn't put up with the monster bigot, who drove their child Bair Srivastav from upstate New York to Long Island so the child could visit the father.

Btw -- Bair Srivastav has learned very well from Maggot how to gay-bash.  On Facebook, Bair joined in a comments thread where the poster, Damnear Divine, started the thread by saying "Insult the person that comments before you." David Knighton commented before Maggot's son Bair Srivastav.  And Maggot the professional gay basher's son Bair Srivastav then said "Heard a rumor that everybody named david knighton is automatically gay."   Further down in the comments, a certain Bobby Higley skipped the order of insults and said "Hey bair, you mother is a disgusting person, and it is sad you are such an embittered little troll"

You just know that Maggot Gagginwhore -- learning right now of a gay or lesbian couple similarly estranged and shuttling a kid back-and-forth like that -- would ruthlessly rip into the couple, attempting to stigmatize all gay couples, and using the anecdote as a political weapon against gay human beings' most basic civil rights. As it is, she taught her demon spawn to gay-bash on the internet. The first thing that came to Bair Srivastav's mind when he was told to insult somebody, was to say they were "automatically gay."  Good job raising your gay-bashing bigot child, Maggot.  Real fine work you're doing as a mother. The piglet feeds at the same trough as the sow.

Bair Srivastav is scheduled to graduate in 2013 from a creepy Opus Dei-affiliated indoctrination center -- The Heights School in Potomac, Maryland, where he plays baseball but has a record of zero home runs. So much for the presence of a heterosexual father making a big macho man out of Gagginwhore's son. Imagine the baseball skills that Bair Srivastav might have learned from the out gay professional ball player Billy Bean, had Billy instead of the Srivastav cipher been Bair's father. Don't forget that through the notorious NOM blog, Maggot took a sleazebag slap at Zach Wahls. Which brings us to Maggot Gagginwhore's bastard son Patrick Gallagher:

Oops!  Not the right Patrick Gallagher.  That Patrick Gallagher is the successful gay-friendly actor from the TV hit Glee.  Here is Maggot Gagginwhore's spawn:

Whether or not you see some family resemblance there, some weight of evidence suggests that Patrick has at least at times been on the gay-bashing NOM payroll.  As an aspiring auteur of Broadway musicals, Patrick Gallagher certainly has never taken a public stand against his hateful bigot monster of a mother.  Which is really quite something, considering that the Broadway musical theater -- a quintessential American art form -- has always been, is now and will always be heavily dependent for its flourishing on the talents and enthusiasms of homosexual human beings -- you know -- the people that Maggot Gagginwhore is not willing to live in a country with, if they are given any rights. 

At this link is a video of Patrick Gallagher making a pathetic attempt to "sing" the song "My Luck." When that craptastic video was posted to the popular gay-interest site Joe. My. God., a commenter said: "Patrick's mother Maggie is probably buying his silence by paying his bills."

However that may be, the fact is, ***IF*** Patrick Gallagher were to have some huge success on Broadway, his obese bigot mother would stand in the way of his fully enjoying it.  After all -- given a Broadway audience -- how could Maggot Gagginwhore even have the nerve to show her fugly bigot face to share in the excitement of her son's having a hit show?  Too many of her innocent victims would be in the audience.  If Patrick won a Tony and Maggot dared to attend the awards show, she would very likely get what she so richly deserves; pelted with rotten eggs, dog poo and tomatoes. When Maggot attended a Broadway reading of Dustin Lance Black's play "8", she reportedly kept her snout in bags of junk food throughout the evening.

Maggot Gagginwhore -- the nasty, lying, gay-bashing bitch -- plainly cares more about hatin' on the homo than she does about creating conditions for her son Patrick to enjoy maximum eventual success in his Broadway career, cough, cough.  If she really wanted her son to be as happy as possible -- if she didn't want her grotesque bigot's shadow hanging over him everywhere he goes on Broadway, and elsewhere -- the obese bigot would shed the weight of her bigotry and find another line of work.  Don't hold your breath, waiting for this crappy mother and obese bigot Maggot Gagginwhore to do so.

HEIDI THOMPSON, GAY-BASHING CRIMINAL

Heidi Smith Thompson the gay-bashing criminal has been arrested in North Carolina and charged with theft and contributing to the delinquency of a minor.

The gay-bashing bitch has acknowledged her guilt, though she hilariously alleges that her 12-year-old daughter per HER up to STEALING the signs.

Thompson the gay-bashing bigot stole lawn signs against the proposed Bigot Ballot in North Carolina.  The gay-bashing hate measure would codify anti-gay discrimination into the state constitution while also stripping rights from couples -- gay and straight -- in civil unions and domestic partnerships.  Children of couples gay and/or straight in domestic partnerships and civil unions also would be stripped of rights and benefits as a result of the gay-bashing attitudes of monsters like Heidi Thompson. When a professional gay-bashing group in the state attempted to find one CEO to speak in favor of the proposed gay-bashing amendment, the bigots came a cropper.  By contrast, dozens and dozens of business leaders have spoken out against the hateful bigot ballot.

One gay rights activist -- alarmed that Thompson had corrupted her own child by introducing her to a life of criminality -- alerted Moore County Children Protective Services -- and called on officials to investigate.

Thompson runs the "Fun in the Sun Swim Camp" where victims are exposed to her daily Bible study lessons. Evidently, the section of the Bible that reads "Thou shalt not steal" gets skipped over as part of the summer fun in the sun.

A hardened, unrepentant criminal, Thompson the gay bashing bitch told a local reporter that she thinks there was nothing wrong in her breaking laws and using her child as an accomplice -- because "God" is on her side.  Heidi Thompson the gay-bashing bigot wins today's SHIT FOR BRAINS award.

PASTOR SEAN, CLOSET-CASE PUSSY

Pastor Sean Harris thinks that the American public has never noticed the connection between 1) "Christian" pastors screaming at their parishioners about the alleged evils of homosexuality, and 2) Pathetic closet cases getting fucked up their pussy asses on the down-low.  Ted Haggard, "Bishop" Eddie Long -- seen one, you've seen 'em all, except that everybody has already seen dozens of them ---

Big he-man macho preachers so bursting with internalized homophobia that the only way they can overcome it is to suck dick and get fucked up their pathetic bigot asses.

Sean Harris is not even alone in telling parishioners they should beat the gay out of their kids.

Wow Pastor Sean -- it takes a real man to break a kid's wrist, right?

NOT!!!!!!!!

Pastor Sean Harris is a fucking pussy closet case, not even man enough to admit his sublimated homosexual desires to his parishioners.

The pathetic pussy Sean Harris wins today's SHIT FOR BRAINS award:

.

SANDRA GLOWACKI AND GAY HOLOCAUST VICTIMS

by Scott Rose

Sandra Randolfi Glowacki is a malcious gay-bashing Michigan bigot who thinks that her children Daniel and Devon have a constitutional right to gay bash in the public schools.

Apparently proud of the Catholic Church's history of imprisoning, torturing and murdering those it does not like,  the Glowackis are proud of Daniel Glowacki's having introduced anti-gay hostility into his classroom on Spirit Day, October 20, 2010.

The Glowacki's gay-bashing mentality appears to be in sync with that of Clint McCance, the Arkansas public school board vice-president who said that he would only wear a purple Spirit Day shirt if all "fags" committed suicide.

In her suit against the Howell, Michigan schools, Glowackis' attorneys are from The Thomas More Law Center, which is comprised of hate-filled Pope representatives who think that all homosexuals are filthy dirty sub-humans undeserving of rights. Their pleading in the case is a gay-bashing hate speech document, not a professional listing of facts relevant to the case. Note that Thomas More as Lord Chancellor to Henry VIII had people burned at the stake as "heretics."

Sandra Randolfi Glowacki to this day has relatives in Italy, where Mussolini's granddaughter answered to criticisms of fascism by saying that it is better to be a fascist than a faggot. Mussolini entered into a power-sharing agreement with the Vatican, in which the Church and the government were virtually inseparable. The schools were required to teach daily propaganda religious lessons in support of the Church's power, and the Church fully supported Mussolini's government. While Mussolini detested homosexual persons, and thought they were filthy dirty sub-humans unworthy of rights, he simultaneously denied that there were any homosexuals in Italy while doing everything he could to have them persecuted.

Many gay Italians were sent to concentration camps to be exploited as slave labor, tortured and murdered. And this is where we can see the psycho-social historical link between the Holocaust and Sandra Randolfi Glowacki. Glowacki does not want anything done in U.S. schools to lower the rate of LGBT teen suicide.

Homocaust.com is a website with good general introductory information pertaining to gay Holocaust victims.  Here is a description from that site of gay concentration camp inmates being driven to suicide within the concentration camps due to bullying non-acceptance of gay human beings, a bullying non-acceptance of them that Sandra Glowacki today continues.

Gays were treated with particular contempt not only by the SS but also by many of the other inmates, who regarded them as degenerate perverts. Life in the camps was a solitary existence making it hard to survive mentally for any period of time. In the face of such hatred and degradation, it is no surprise that many committed suicide by running into electric perimeter fences rather than face ongoing persecution.

Sandra Glowacki has taught her children that gay human beings should be treated like concentration camp prisoners, tortured until they run into that electric perimeter fence.If that is not her mentality, then why has she filed a gay-bashing court pleading demanding an end to Spirit Day observances? Be sure to read Gay Basher Sandy Glowacki's Dirty Laundry.

PORNO PETE IS A PANSY-ASSED BIGOT

by Scott Rose

Peter LaBarbera, aka "Porno Pete" is one of the very ugliest closet cases in creation.

When I say ugly, what I mean is that he has an ugly, ugly, ugly soul.

As a brainwashed gay-bashing zombie for Jesus, Porno Pete is obsessed with the idea that LGBTers are right on the verge of causing the Virgin Mary to lose her virginity, and society to collapse.

So obsessed is Porno Pete with the most bizarre of all same-sex fetishes, that he spends untold hours and energies researching them; most gay people do not know that the fetishes Porno Pete obsesses over even exist.

And that is why, when recently we saw for a first time a blog called "TruthVsTolerance," and noticed that many of the posts there manifest an obsession with exotic esoteric sexual fetishes, we had a clue that Porno Pete was the ugly closet case behind the blog. Another hint that Porno Pete is the fetish-obsessed mind behind TruthVsTolerance is that he also mans . . so to speak . . Americans for the Truth about Homosexuality.

If Porno Pete understands the truth about homosexuality, then I am Michelangelo painting the Sistine Chapel Ceiling.

Now, in the interest of "the truth," we must ask -- is Porno Pete really behind the TruthVsTolerance blog? No actual person's name is given, though the e-mail for the gay-bashing hate speech site is truthvstolerance@gmail.com

Why not stop by TruthVsTolerance, and leave Porno Pete, or whoever that is, a little comment, telling them what you think about their asinine gay-bashing?

Porno Pete went off the rails when Dan Savage called Bible-thumping gay bashers "pansy-assed," and Savage later apologized, but, we will be a rat's ass if we will ever apologize to Porno "Pansy-Assed" Pete LaBarbera.

SANDRA GLOWACKI AND THE NAZIS

by Scott Rose

Spirit Day is an annual remembrance of LGBT youth lost to bulliedcide.

Many school districts voluntarily participate in Spirit Day observations, hoping to put a break on the scourge of anti-LGBT bullying.

Every LGBT bullycide victim had a mother.

But Daniel Glowacki's mother Sandra Randolfi Glowacki evidently doesn't give a fuck.

The dead were only dirty inferior homosexuals; why should she care?

Sandra, indeed, believes that God gave her son a right to perpetuate anti-LGBT bullying.

On Spirit Day, October 20, 2010, the smug little gay-bashing bigot Daniel Glowacki introduced anti-gay hostility to the classroom while his teacher Jay McDowell was making a Spirit Day-themed Economics class presentation. McDowell had the obstreperous little bigot leave the classroom.

The school district has a shameful history of racism; only recently, students had set up an anti-black Facebook page with a Confederate Flag as its logo. The day Daniel Glowacki introduced anti-gay hostility into the classroom, a fellow student arrived wearing a Confederate Flag symbol. McDowell had that student remove her Confederate Flag.

Glowacki then demanded to know why that student could not wear her Confederate Flag, if others -- (on Spirit Day!) -- were being allowed to wear their purple "Tyler's Army" Spirit Day t-shirts, which offended him.

For Glowacki to say on Spirit Day in class that the purple shirts offended him, is akin to a white supremacist saying that a Black History Month presentation offends him, and to a neo-Nazi saying that a Holocaust history lesson offends him, because all Jews offend him.

Sandra and Daniel Glowacki as professional gay bashers don't necessarily know the teacher Jay McDowell's life history. For all they know, he had a lesbian niece who killed herself after being bullied without mercy in a public school. But, as said above, Daniel Glowacki's mother Sandra Randolfi Glowacki evidently just doesn't give a fuck.

In the federal court lawsuit that Sandra Lynn Randolfi Glowacki is bringing against the Howell schools and Jay McDowell,  the gay-bashing Glowackis and their gay-bashing Thomas More Law Center attorneys allege that "the universal, consistent moral teaching of the Roman Catholic Church" compelled Daniel to introduce anti-gay hostility into the classroom on Spirit Day.

Now let us examine "the universal, consistent moral teaching of the Roman Catholic Church," to see why it necessitates anti-gay hostility. The Pope and the Catholic Church blessed The Crusades, in which Catholics slaughtered countless innocent Jews and Muslims all over Europe and the Middle East. They raped no small number of women while they were at it, but what is a little inconsistency in your moral teaching when you are carrying out a Pope-blessed mission to murder Jews and Muslims?

While Catholic leaders in France went about the genocide of French Protestants, called Huguenots, the Catholic Church of Rome did not make a peep of protest. The infamous forced conversions and expulsions of the Jews and Muslims of Spain -- The Inquisition -- was directed from Rome, where the Vatican called itself The Holy Office of the Inquisition. During the Inquisition, people in Spain found guilty of sodomy were burned to death at the stake. 

Which brings us to Sandra Randolfi Glowacki and the Nazis.

Sandra is Italian on her mother's side. The Pope secured independent nation status from dictator Benito Mussolini in a power-sharing agreement. That's what it was, for all that Catholics don't much like to talk about the subject these days. Throughout Mussolini's dictatorship, the state required all schools to give religious lessons in Catholicism.

Where was Sandra Randolfi Glowacki's Italian family while that was that was going on? (Here you can read the article "Italy Finally Ready to Recognize Suffering of Gays in Holocaust Camp").  Mussolini's granddaughter, active in Italian politics, once reacted to criticisms of fascism by saying "It's better to be a fascist than a faggot." Might Sandra Randolfi Glowacki and/or her relatives agree that it is better to be a fascist than a faggot?

As for the Glowacki side of the family -- when the Catholic Church signed its notorious treaty with Hitler -- the Reichskonkordat -- anti-Jewish racial laws were already in effect in Germany. The treaty swore the loyalty of the German Bishops to Hitler. Be it noted in passing; the Vatican wished Adolph Hitler a  happy birthday every year he was in power. To see a photo of the Nazi flag flying from the Catholic cathedral in Cologne, Germany, scroll to the middle of the page at this link. Notice that at the bottom of that page, there is a photo of Bishop Coch giving the Hitler salute. Given the Church history of muderous Crusades, Huguenot slaughters, and Inquisitions, one can see where giving a Hitler salute would fit right in with "the universal, consistent moral teaching of the Roman Catholic Church" that Sandra Glowacki mentions in her gay-bashing lawsuit.

Is it only coincidence that in 1817, in Zelow, Poland, the priest who made the first recorded mark of a Jewish presence there was named Aleksander Glowacki? Glowacki went on to issue an order against renting rooms to Jews in the city. Eventually, though, Zelow came to be used as a herding ground for Jews prior to their being shipped to concentration camps to be murdered. After the war, the Vatican helped Nazi war criminals to evade justice through the "rat lines" to South America; many of the Nazis whom the Vatican helped to evade justice paid Vatican officials with goods stolen from Jews and made off with the rest of the stolen booty themselves.

Now that we have an accurate understanding of "the universal, consistent moral teaching of the Roman Catholic Church," let us ask, where were Sandra Randolfi Glowacki's relatives during the World War II period? What were they doing, with their understanding of "the universal, consistent moral teaching of the Roman Catholic Church"?

More recently, "the universal, consistent moral teaching of the Roman Catholic Church" has been rearing its ugly head in various ways beyond the Glowacki's gay-bashing lawsuit. When Father Jaime Duenas of the Bronx was arrested in August, 2011, on charges he had repeatedly molested a 16-year-old girl working in the Church rectory, Archbishop Dolan, now Cardinal Dolan, took to his blog, where he trashed the 16-year-old girl.

Catholics actually do believe that Jews will go to hell if they do not accept Jesus as "their savior," but they can not, in a public school environment, repeatedly voice that negative anti-Jewish judgement, because to do so would be to create an illegal, non-religion-neutral learning environment hostile to the Jewish students.

Advocating for religion-based, anti-gay hostility is illegal in a public school classroom, for the same reasons. The question has already been tested.

Yet, Sandra and Daniel Glowacki are alleging in their lawsuit that Daniel had a right to disrupt a Spirit Day observation with anti-gay hostility because "As Catholics, Plaintiffs have a duty and obligation to defend their faith in public, including a duty to speak the truth about homosexuality."

Catholic dogma, and the truth, are not the same thing, as Galileo knew. Catholic dogma no more contains "the truth" about homosexuality than Sandra Glowacki is a ravishingly beautiful, sexy young bikini model. Her federal court pleading is full of the most medieval and insulting gay bashing; it fits right in with burning known gay people at the stake.

Which is quite the coincidence, given that Glowacki presents herself as a Catholic martyr in a fund-raising promotion video for the so-called National Organization for Marriage. NOM's mastermind gay-basher Robert George also is on the Board of the Family Research Council, an SPLC-certified anti-gay hate group. When Congressman Brad Sherman proposed a congressional resolution against the "Kill the Gays" law in Uganda, NOM's George's FRC spent $25,000 lobbying against the resolution, on the grounds that it constituted "pro-homosexual promotion." In other words, NOM thinks that the only good gay is a dead gay.  NOM did, after all, sponsor an anti-gay hate rally in the Bronx in May, 2011, where a NOM-approved speaker yelled through a megaphone at the crowd that homosexuals are "worthy to death."  NOM has communicated its "The only good gay is a dead gay" message in umpteen other ways. It made a promotional film similar to the Glowackis' NOM video, with Jerry Buell, a Florida public school teacher who told his class that homosexuals should be allowed to serve in the military, at the front lines with heterosexual troops deserting them from behind.

Read through Glowacki's federal court pleading, to see if this vile gay-bashing bigot is not in effect saying, yeah, let's keep the anti-gay bullying going, until every last LGBT teen has committed suicide. Clint McCance, a school board vice-president in Arkansas, did react to Spirit Day by saying that he would only wear a purple shirt if every gay student killed themselves.

Every once in a while, a Catholic Church official in America says what the Church really thinks, but is so hateful that even the Church has to distance itself -- if only by a micro-measure -- from the statement. Such a thing happened when the Church's Daniel Avila said that all gay people were created by the Devil, not by God.

What arrogance -- what towering, stinking bigot's arrogance -- for Sandra Glowacki to write in a federal court document that Catholic dogma is "the truth" about homosexuality.

How dare she?

Where were all of her family members and ancestors during the Crusades, the Inquisition and the Holocaust?  Where were they? Did they maybe burn a few sodomites at the stake? What were they doing all that time in line with "the universal, consistent moral teaching of the Roman Catholic Church?"

Here -- while we wait to learn details of Glowacki family history -- is a photo of Adolph Hitler greeting a Catholic Cardinal. The photo helps to illustrate something included in Glowacki's lawsuit: "the universal, consistent moral teaching of the Roman Catholic Church."